- MRG applicability and rent setting must be derived for each unit from its construction and contractual history.
- An agreed fixed term, legal enforceability and actual return of the unit are separate matters.
- A contract overview should generate specific questions for review and keep unexplained jumps in income visible.
Which documents belong to a tenancy?
Start with the signed agreement, all amendments, handover documents and adjustment letters. Add relevant agreements on payment deferrals, investments, subletting or changes of use, and court or administrative decisions. A contract summary from the property manager makes the work easier but does not replace a missing document. Deviations followed in practice also belong in the review file.
Link the documents using the unit identifier in the rent roll. Record the contracting parties and any changes to them, the precisely defined rental premises, and ancillary rooms and areas included in the letting. A commercial lease may cover several rooms listed separately in the area schedule. Without this reconciliation, floor-area rates may be incorrect or ancillary charges counted twice.
Why the construction year cannot replace a full legal review
§ 1 MRG distinguishes between scopes of application and exemptions. Classification may depend, among other things, on construction and approval history, public funding, condominium ownership, how individual units were created and contract dates. An attic rental unit created later may therefore be subject to different requirements from an existing apartment in the same building. Subsidy law and particular contractual circumstances must also be examined.
Keep one row per unit showing its provisional classification and the evidence actually available to support it. Label assumptions explicitly. In Vienna, owners, property managers and duly authorised persons can inspect approved building plans in the MA 37 archive. The plans help reconstruct the history and use; the legal conclusion can only be reached by considering all the evidence together.
Foundations: RIS – Bundeskanzleramt [1] · Stadt Wien – MA 37 [4]
Check rent setting and indexation separately
The question of the permissible initial rent comes before updating it. Where § 16 MRG applies, the requirements of the relevant rent-setting method and the specific contract date are decisive. The label in the agreement or a comparison of listings does not establish a legally defensible amount. Existing agreements also require consideration of historical rules and subsequent agreements.
For indexation, document the wording of the clause, reference index, initial value, threshold, adjustment letters and implementation to date. Have its validity and the statutory limits applicable on the valuation date checked. A general inflation assumption must not replace the unresolved legal question. Record a potential change as an amount with its earliest effective date before it enters the income plan.
| Finding | Evidence required | Question for legal review |
|---|---|---|
| Rent increased by amendment | Signed amendment and prior history | Is the new amount permissible and validly agreed? |
| Indexation included in the rent roll | Clause and adjustment calculation | From when is which amount enforceable? |
| Commercial use subsequently changed | Agreement and use documents | What are the consequences of the documented change? |
| Ancillary room included in the letting | Agreement, plan and actual use | Is the area separately available or already committed? |
Foundations: RIS – Bundeskanzleramt [2]
When can a later reletting be assumed?
Record the signing date, commencement date, end date agreed in writing and every extension separately. Among other matters, § 29 MRG governs the requirements for fixed terms and the consequences of continued use. The version in force since 2026 also distinguishes residential fixed terms according to whether the landlord acts as a business. Contract and extension dates and transitional provisions must therefore be checked; an older table rule using the same minimum term in every case is inadequate.
Even a valid fixed term does not make the later cash flow certain. A planned extension, actual return of the unit, reinstatement work and marketing time affect the start of a new agreement. For open-ended agreements, a desired change of tenant must not be modelled using an arbitrary date. Necessary legal steps and possible outcomes remain explicitly unresolved while evidence is missing.
Foundations: RIS – Bundeskanzleramt [3] · RIS – Bundeskanzleramt [1]
Turn the contract review into a useful list of assumptions
Transfer only the result of each review into the income assumptions: documented existing arrangements, a professionally confirmed change or a conditional scenario. State which unit is affected, when the amount changes and which evidence supports that change. An unresolved legal dispute receives its own description of possible financial and timing consequences.
Prioritise review tasks according to their influence on the decision. An unclear contract end date for a large commercial unit may matter more than a small rounding error in an ancillary area. When the work is complete, the valuation professional should be able to identify which income is reliably documented and where an additional legal review could materially change the result.
Fictional case: two apartments, two contractual histories
An imagined Vienna building with an older apartment and an attic unit created later; this is not a real property or a conclusive MRG classification.
- The agreement and payment records are available for the existing apartment. For the attic unit, the management overview contains only the construction year and an agreement described as fixed-term.
- The owner adds approval documents, the history of the unit's creation, the contract date and amendments. The legal review examines the scope of application separately for each unit.
- A jump in income planned in the model immediately after the contract end remains on hold until the fixed term, the assumed return of the unit and the requirements for reletting have been clarified.
The description of the building does not establish a uniform rent mechanism. The verifiable contractual history determines whether future income appears in the existing position or only in a scenario.
Your next assessment steps
Record what you have already clarified and which documents you still need.
Complete agreement for each unit
This defines the rental premises, parties and agreed rights.
Where can I obtain the supporting information?
Bring together original documents and the management archive.
Approval and development history
This provides essential facts for reviewing the scope of MRG application.
Where can I obtain the supporting information?
Cross-check your own building files with approved MA 37 plans.
Chronology of fixed terms and extensions
This shows which version and transitional questions need to be examined.
Where can I obtain the supporting information?
Arrange agreements chronologically and have them legally reviewed.
Calculations for all rent adjustments
These link the amount currently assumed to its basis.
Where can I obtain the supporting information?
Request them from the property manager, including clauses and letters.
Reading and checking are possible without signing in. Your saved checklists are private under My area. The selection does not confirm a professional assessment of your property.
Sources and date
The following sources support this main article. For your specific property, current documents and the applicable conditions matter.
- RIS – BundeskanzleramtTenancy Act: in particular § 1 and transitional provisions
- RIS – BundeskanzleramtTenancy Act § 16: agreements on the amount of base rent
- RIS – BundeskanzleramtTenancy Act § 29: termination and renewal of the tenancy agreement
- Stadt Wien – MA 37Inspect approved building plans in the building authority's archive
Editorial date: 11/09/2026. Examples explain relationships and do not contain an individually prepared property valuation. Editorial work and sources.
Report an unclear point